No
339, October 16, 2010
*************************
INDEPENDENCE, TAX AND FEDERALISM I see too many things that do not go, nonsense, waste delays and is not a question of the political color of the ruler, but the "machine" that does not work. Concrete examples of dozens, but the basic problem is that a greater share of resources paid by the citizens must remain where they are produced and, above all, that the services provided the state pay a share more or less the same for everyone.
This concept should apply to the cost of an operation for appendicitis as with any public service and who has wasted resources and really called for greater responsibility to not continue to be borne by those who behaved well, perhaps by pulling the belt. These things
support at all levels and I am convinced that Berlusconi would like to apply these principles with their eyes closed, but the "machine" grinds years and resources regardless of who is at the helm. If, however, that whenever Brunetta, Tremonti Gelmini or anyone else tries to change something is just and only the walls of "no", as it will come out?
Only with accountability "basic", because only where the public administrator is directly known, appreciated or criticized by its own citizens who feel their sense of responsibility. A Federalism and solidarity from the bottom up is the only way for the city to impose a minimum of real control over the elect. But those who administer must then also have the opportunity to do so: for more than a year the mayor and I do not complain to the effort or responsibility, but slow for the slow pace of the decisions, controls, procedures, constraints, costs "added" to observe a bureaucratic system of controls always impenetrable, opaque, officially put there to prevent abuse but that stops those who want to work and create an alibi for those who want to keep quiet. Unfortunately, this is the sacred truth!
SERIOUS? CONSISTENCY!
Last week, I pointed out as October 15 of each year, every town in Italy is expected to approve the draft budget came in for the next year and its investment plan, but this year is not yet known the extent of the "cuts "the local authorities. Nor is it known yet whether or not included in working both the asset ICI leading to a "gap" of hypotheses that can make any idea of \u200b\u200bbusting the budget. But - above all - are imposed cuts of up to 80% of individual items of expenditure (such as exhibitions and did the tourist and cultural). I can understand that need spending cuts, but then it is determined that any municipality or local government - established a ceiling of expenditure - is then free to decide how and where to make cuts and reductions because it is absurd not to allow - for example - to the tourist areas to organize events that attract attention, or worse, not understanding that the 'Italy is above culture, monuments, history, art: if it can not be used to create tourism, linked activities we destroy the most important thing we have. That is why I spoke WEDNESDAY 'DISSENT IN THE ROOM AND I HAVE NOT VOTED ON THE MOTION OF THE MAJORITY OF PUBLIC FINANCE SCHEME 2011-2013. In attendance were Tremonti and several ministers may not have liked my speech, but with great serenity and freedom I have explained my point of view, announcing that I will continue to disagree in public unless I see serious decisions, motivated and consistent.
PIEDMONT: JUSTICE FOR THE ELECTION!
In the coming days, the State Council shall decide on the regional vote in Piedmont where people have elected their Governor by about 10,000 votes ROBERTO COTA waste. It is unthinkable that legal loopholes to be canceled the popular vote and return it for questionable judgments a left-wing administration. I am quietly confident that the Judiciary will act with integrity, but as things seemed very clear to all and now they want to confuse you, you should recall at least four points.
- Admitted also were not valid for lack of presentation of two lists eligible to vote, the fact remains that the vote was plural (for lists and for the government), as expressly noted in the instructions for voting.
- Where were therefore also removed a list and the votes allocated to it, this may limit the claims to the elected regional council with that list, but can not apply to the vote given to the President, because if the symbols (which are indicated "COTA" so great as a symbol) were not printed on the card, their voters would have voted in support of other lists Cota, very difficult to Bresso. Among other things, one of the two list in question had just gone out of the 'UDC officially deployed against the former president.
- The TAR Piemonte is as expensive as getting a count of no use because it is well known that over 90% of voters do not vote "twice" but it was merely a list. Then supposedly want to take into account only the votes cast showing the "double cross" on the card means you want to delete the real desire of the people.
- but were then lists do not really presentable? But even if you have to want to enter a court when - before the election - there was already an appeal on their presentation, which was rejected. We are the absurd: the court first part lists and now the TAR cancel the elections because they had been placed the same lists? I think we're bordering on the absurd.
- In any case tomorrow to redo the election by changing the candidate is equally absurd, then you should turn to be consistent with the candidates themselves, the same list (minus those "offending") and not change all the electoral framework. Meanwhile, we think that the judges (and in the air there is a new reference) you can imagine how it influenced the development of the region in this state of uncertainty.
ACTIVITIES 'PARLIAMENTARY
Segnalo some of my parliamentary initiatives of the week: Question for the encouragement of Car pooling and a system of "environmental accounting", an intervention in the next budget law because there is more attention paid to the municipalities with the accounts in order. Finally, a proposal that should be deepened and taken on board as ballast and planted the junctions of highways (of course respecting the security policy) with thousands of new trees would not only be ecologically useful, but would also often a hand to reduce the noise, the ' pollution, environmental impact and they act as windbreaks. I wonder if the Ministry of Environment and Autostrade resume with facts my proposal that I sent to them.
A WARM WELCOME TO ALL! MARCO ZACCHERA
0 comments:
Post a Comment